We shall focus on metaanalysis of randomised trials evaluating therapies, but much the same. Metaanalysis refers to statistical analyses that are used to synthesize summary data from a series of studies. The gwama genomewide association metaanalysis software has been developed to perform metaanalysis of summary statistics generated from genome. Anwaya nirphirake discusses heterogeneity in metaanalysis. Heterogeneity is not something to be afraid of, it just means that there is variability in your data.
Metaanalysis helps aggregate the information, often overwhelming, from many studies in a principled way into one unified final conclusion or provides the reason why such a conclusion. These show the expected distribution of studies in the absence of heterogeneity or of selection bias. Studies included in a metaanalysis must have common outcome statistics that allow their results to be combined. I am planning now to use revman for the first time and do a metaanalysis on. Heterogeneity in metaanalysis q, isquare statsdirect. It is often appropriate to take a broader perspective in a metaanalysis than in a single clinical trial. In statistics, study heterogeneity is a problem that can arise when attempting to undertake a metaanalysis. Methodological standards for metaanalyses and qualitative. Subgroup analyses using a test of interaction based on cochrans q test were subsequently performed. Conversely, q has too much power as a test of heterogeneity if the number of studies is large higgins et al. To learn more about cytels custom software solutions, click the button below. This may include key patient characteristics, such as age and disease severity, methods for diagnosis and evaluation, followup, treatment doses and duration, and study design features, such as level of blinding. We describe what metaanalysis is, what heterogeneity is, and how it affects metaanalysis, effect size, the modeling techniques of metaanalysis, and strengths and. A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta.
A fixedeffect metaanalysis provides a result that may be viewed as a typical intervention effect from the studies included. Metaanalysis of prevalence journal of epidemiology. In addition to pooling effect sizes, metaanalysis can also be used to estimate disease. Statistical heterogeneity is most frequently quoted since a measure for this is derived as. Metadisc allows users to test for heterogeneity amongst various studies in two different ways. Primary studies heterogeneity caused by betweenstudy differences is an expected circumstance.
I think that the i 2 value is a measure of statistical heterogeneity which is not entirely synonymous with clinical or methodological heterogeneity. Tests of statistical heterogeneity for the metaanalysis of fall related injuries gave the following results. Evaluate study heterogeneity with subgroup analysis or metaregression. Identifying systematic heterogeneity patterns in genetic. Its input interface is also unique in that once it is understood. Metaanalysis should only be considered when a group of studies is sufficiently homogeneous in terms of participants, interventions and outcomes to provide a meaningful summary. Statsdirect calls statistics for measuring heterogentiy in metaanalysis noncombinability statistics in order to help the user to interpret the results. Data to be extracted from individual studies to permit metaanalysis. In metaanalysis, the fraction of variance that is due to heterogeneity is estimated by the statistic i2. The citations, search methods, type of metaanalysis, inclusionexclusion criteria for individual studies, use of quality assessment tools, pooling methods, methods for evaluating.
The heterogeneity statistic i 2 can be biased in small. Metaanalysis is a method to obtain a weighted average of results from various studies. For example, a prediction interval for the true effect in a new study, which encompasses the full distribution of effects in a randomeffects metaanalysis, is a convenient. Metaanalysis for psychiatric research using free software. Q is included in each statsdirect metaanalysis function because it forms. In a metaanalysis, researchers assess heterogeneity across studies, examine subgroups of studies to determine if selected subsets of the research data provide similar or different. So, if one brings together different studies for analysing them or doing a metaanalysis, it is. Author summary metaanalysis of genomewide association studies gwas is a valuable tool for the discovery of genes that protect or predispose individuals to common complex diseases. Variation across studies heterogeneity must be considered, although most. As the goal of metaanalysis is to combine individual studies giving more. Caution if random effects return meaningfully different results from fixed effects.
In this course we will discuss the logic of metaanalysis and the way that it is. Clinical heterogeneity refers to variation in the characteristics of the included studies. We calculate the bias of i2, focusing on the situation where the number of. The opposite of heterogeneity is homogeneity meaning that all studies show the same effect. The metaanalysis estimate represents a weighted average across studies and when there is heterogeneity this may result in the summary estimate not being representative of individual studies. Its analysis is crucial for defining whether selected primary studies pooling is fit for meta. Essentially, m measures systematic heterogeneity, whilst qstatistic, i 2 measure random variantspecific heterogeneity. Biostatistics in psychiatry 27, report by shanghai archives of psychiatry. To assess heterogeneity of effect measures between studies in epidemiologic metaanalysis, two models are used. Use funnel plots and formal tests to explore publication bias and smallstudy effects. If too much heterogeneity, dont do a metaanalysis of all studies understand why. So, if one brings together different studies for analysing them or doing a metaanalysis, it is clear that there will be differences found. Heterogeneity in metaanalysis refers to the variation in study outcomes between studies.
1135 1050 904 987 899 618 443 972 977 569 1274 745 1210 533 548 1437 1528 139 1018 634 771 577 1270 1198 409 100 30 961 597 581 510 703 236 1378 971 961 18 900 1202 1377 769 1069 598 524 55